HR at S0 (hrS0)
Definition
In TRIPS, hrS0 is the heart rate associated with your S0 anchor.
In plain language, it is the heart rate that best matches your economical flat-ground baseline pace.
That means hrS0 is not supposed to be:
- your average hiking heart rate
- your threshold heart rate
- your highest sustainable all-day heart rate
It is a baseline anchor that helps TRIPS interpret where your economical walking state sits inside your broader heart-rate range.
Why hrS0 matters
TRIPS uses several heart-rate-related anchors to interpret effort.
hrS0 matters because it helps define where your baseline walking state sits between:
- resting heart rate
- higher sustainable effort
If hrS0 is set unrealistically low or high, the planner can interpret your baseline effort in a way that does not really match you.
So even though many users should leave the default alone at first, hrS0 still matters as part of the overall physiology anchor picture.
Where the default comes from
TRIPS gives users a derived default instead of forcing everyone to guess a baseline heart rate for their walking anchor.
That default is meant to be a practical midpoint-style assumption based on your broader heart-rate anchors.
The important user-facing point is:
- the default is a starting estimate
- not a personal physiological measurement
What makes a good hrS0 value
A good hrS0 value should be:
- tied to the same baseline state as
S0 - believable
- repeatable
- measured under reasonably controlled conditions
Good evidence:
- a treadmill-style anchor test
- a repeatable flat-ground heart rate tied to your real baseline pace
- a known value you trust more than the default
Weak evidence:
- a heart rate copied from steep terrain
- a value from a highly fatigued day
- a number chosen because it makes the effort story look nicer
Relationship to S0, E0, hrRest, and hrAeT
hrS0 works best when interpreted together with:
S0, your baseline speed anchorE0, your baseline energy-per-distance anchorhrRest, your lower heart-rate anchorhrAeT, your upper heart-rate anchor for planning interpretation
Those anchors are supposed to describe the same general physiological baseline.
That is why overriding just one of them casually can make the whole set less believable.
What hrS0 is not for
hrS0 should not be used as:
- a route-output tuning knob
- a shortcut for making effort bands feel nicer
- a substitute for better baseline physiology inputs
If route interpretation looks off, the first things to revisit are usually:
- whether
hrRestis believable - whether
hrAeTis believable - whether
S0actually reflects your real baseline pace
before trying to invent a cleaner hrS0.
Default versus manual override
For many users, the default is the safest first choice.
That is especially true if:
- your resting heart rate is believable
- your aerobic-threshold estimate is at least broadly believable
- you do not have a controlled test result for your baseline walking pace
A manual override makes more sense when you have strong evidence that the default clearly misrepresents your real baseline heart-rate anchor.
Practical advice
For most users:
- leave
hrS0on the default at first - override it only if you have evidence tied to your real baseline pace
- avoid tuning it just to make the planner feel emotionally reassuring
The best question to ask is:
What heart rate best represents my normal economical flat-ground baseline pace, not the heart rate I wish it were?
Notes
hrS0is the heart rate associated with yourS0anchor.- The default is meant to be a practical starting estimate, not a personal measurement.
hrS0works best when interpreted together withS0,E0,hrRest, andhrAeT.- Most users should leave the default alone unless they have better evidence.