Review calibration outputs
Do not assume that a completed ingest means the calibration is ready to use.
This step is about deciding whether the dataset is usable.
What to review first
Start with the dataset summary and ask:
- does the dataset contain enough usable activity?
- does the terrain coverage look broad enough to matter?
- does the heart-rate coverage look usable rather than sparse?
- does the dataset still look representative of the trip style you care about?
What you are trying to decide
You are deciding whether the outputs are:
- usable
- representative
- worth previewing on a route
Signs the calibration may be weak
Be cautious if:
- the dataset looks too small or too narrow
- the files mostly reflect a different activity type
- the outputs appear inconsistent with your recorded trip history
What to do next
If the outputs are usable, preview them on a route and compare before and after.
If the outputs are weak, improve the dataset first instead of forcing the calibration into your workflow.
Read next: